-By Warner Todd Huston
Just before election day the liberal blogs were aflutter with news that 95 Democratic Congressional candidates had taken the pledge to support Net neutrality if they were elected. That turned out to be a very big “if.” More like a forlorn hope, if you will.
Of those 95 Democrats, the number actually going to Congress in January will be… zero. There hasn’t been a wipe-out like this since the Redskins beat the Broncos 42-10 in the 1988 Super Bowl. Or since Atlantis was swept into the sea, or something.
As far as Internet policy is concerned, last night’s lesson for Republicans should be clear: Internet “neutrality” regulation is a loser with the public. It’s also a loser with businesses. It’s even a loser with the labor unions. That’s not a surprise. Union leaders can sometimes get realistic very quickly when confronted with a federal policy that will cost their members jobs.
Increasingly, net neutrality also seems to be a loser with federal regulators themselves. Just prior to the election, an official with the Federal Communications Commission blasted the pro-neutrality group Free Press for handing out waffles at the Commission one morning saying, “While they are busy handing out waffles and making posters, we are focused on creating jobs and protecting consumers.”
Will the far leftists such as the Moveon.org wing of the Democratic Party continue to make noise about net neutrality? Probably. And as the late Lee Atwater used to say, when you’re watching your enemy walk off a cliff, don’t get in his way.
But if they do, it will be even easier for Republicans to draw a sharp policy distinction. Following are some suggestions for the GOP’s Internet policies when Congress returns:
- Focus on job growth: Remember that even through this downturn, communications companies have increased their capital investment. That’s jobs, pure and simple.
- Cost is key: The biggest barrier to making broadband universal across America is cost. Competition, not government policy will make prices competitive.
- Explaining why regulation is a disaster: A recent headline from Fortune tells the whole story: “Uncertain of future regulation, businesses are paralyzed.” Net neutrality would expand this uncertainty across the Internet just as Obama’s other policies are doing to manufacturing, banking and any number of other sectors.
- Emphasizing the benefits of tomorrow’s Internet in everyday terms: Net neutrality is about gutting tomorrow’s Internet by standing in the way of innovation. Want your hospital to have a dedicated connection so a specialist 1,000 miles away can make a real-time diagnosis of your condition? No chance with Net neutrality. If Free Press gets its way, we can kiss a lot of progress goodbye.
Republicans have a window of opportunity to kill this Net Neutrality monster and substitute policies that make good business sense. Net Neutrality as envisioned by Free Press and the left will strangle the one new technology that has the greatest chance to improve all our lives even more than it already has.
____________
“The only end of writing is to enable the reader better to enjoy life, or better to endure it.”
–Samuel Johnson
Warner Todd Huston is a Chicago based freelance writer. He has been writing opinion editorials and social criticism since early 2001 and before that he wrote articles on U.S. history for several small American magazines. His political columns are featured on many websites such as Andrew Breitbart’s BigGovernment.com, BigHollywood.com, and BigJournalism.com, as well as RightWingNews.com, CanadaFreePress.com, StoptheACLU.com, AmericanDaily.com, among many, many others. Mr. Huston is also endlessly amused that one of his articles formed the basis of an article in Germany’s Der Spiegel Magazine in 2008.
For a full bio, please CLICK HERE.
Gee. What is it about backward conservatism carrying water for Internet providers?
I’ve been in IT since 1976. A long time. Back then, to connect a Facsimile (FAX) machine, or MODEM to the AT&T phone system (a monopoly), you had to purchase an additional line. Had to. If AT&T found you were pushing data across their wires without doing so, they would cancel your service.
Along comes the anti-trust breakup of AT&T. Now MODEMs and FAX machines can be connected w/o having to purchase an additional line. THIS IS A GOOD THING. THIS IS NET NEUTRALITY.
Simply, the Carrier has to neutral to the data crossing their lines. No corporate censorship. If a startup offers TV over IP, Comcast, for example, should not be able to curtail that signal.
Making the carrier be signal neutral is a GOOD thing.
The problem is, Shootist, THAT is NOT the goal of Net Neutrality. The NN supporters are only using your nice sensible conception of their goals as a means to institute anti-capitalist policies that will kill the Internet. They’ve admitted as much several times. Don’t blame me that you refuse to see the truth.