---

Evolution Believed by Fools, Fanatics, and Fakers!

-By Don Boys, Ph.D.

My recent article titled, “DNA in Your Body Could Reach to the Sun and Back—70 Times” caused a stir in different parts of the world. I especially had unusual responses from the Canadian Free Press readers. I have never followed the results of my articles but did so because of the volume, vileness, and viciousness of responders. Those atheists/evolutionists really get angry when their religion is debunked!

One wrote, “This is the dumbest g** d*** article I’ve ever read in my life.” Well, that is his opinion but not well expressed. May I point out that he did not try to refute it? Wonder why? Could it be because he is dumb as a box of rocks? No one can tell me where and how DNA gets its information. Information must have a Source. A book does not compile itself. A computer code does not create itself. Only fools, fanatics, and fakers believe such nonsense and non-science.

Another evolutionist wrote pretending to be Jesus. “Thanks for the laugh. My dad and I are totally cracking up. Please keep in mind that my dad created science as way for you to learn what you couldn’t figure out morally. Some people just need that. Also, my dad created evolution to keep the planet going in perpetuity.” I thank the writer for his original and thoughtful message. It is good to hear from Jesus when I read the Bible; however, this is obviously not from the Bible. No doubt, the writer thinks of himself as a wit and he may be half-right. I hope he will take time to refute my article.

Another asked, “Who designed the Designer?” He suggested that “the universe itself become (sic) increasingly ‘intelligent’ and creates from experience and within the physical laws that govern it rather than by magic or supernatural power.” Pray tell how the Universe becomes intelligent? How did it create anything? Moreover, how does the Universe create “from experience”? Furthermore, where did the physical laws originate? Doesn’t it take less faith to simply believe a sovereign, omnipotent God did it all? When my critic asked, “who designed the Designer,” that is where faith comes in. Faith is not scientific; however, nothing creating everything is scientific?

However, he failed to answer my article and took the coward’s way out suggesting that creationists be ignored. . That’s like those who say, “I never answer my critics.” With that, they don’t have to answer their critics! Brilliant thinking! I was told to “Stay in your field and don’t try to lecture others with information that is irrelevant to the subject.” Is he suggesting that someone outside his field has no right to question the “experts”? Surely, he cannot be so closed-minded. But then, we know that is simply an excuse not to answer me since he cannot do so: Where and how does information form DNA?

Of course, the “experts” have been wrong numerous times, often even perpetrating fraud to convince others of the validity of their religion. How about Haeckel’s Recapitulation Theory, Piltdown Man, Nebraska Man, Vestigial organs, the silly Hopeful Monster Theory, the now infamous horse series found in almost all evolutionary texts, the peppered moths of England, etc.? When I ask such questions, evolutionists get as uncomfortable as a dog in hot ashes.

Furthermore, I assume my readers know that Chuck Darwin was not trained as a scientist; only an apostate preacher. I agree that he should have “stayed in his field.” But, alas he did not.

But forget refuting my DNA arguments and tell me how the Universe got here without God. If anyone can do so then this day has been successful. Some of my critics wiggle around this Big Issue by saying evolution only deals with life on earth once it started. They always want to visit Darwin’s warm little pond for which there is absolutely no evidence. Every evolutionist has to teach spontaneous generation of life but no true scientist believes such drivel. Evolutionists all want to start the discussion after life arises. Sorry, but that dog won’t hunt.

Still another desperate Australian evolutionist took exception with my statement “intelligent information can’t happen by accident.” He found that “hilarious.” However almost everyone knows that that is the crux of the argument with proponents of intelligent design and evolutionists. He must live in a cave in the outback. The information question is what stumped Richard Dawkins (for 19 seconds, not 11) during a television interview making him look like a fool. Now, he is asserting, wrongly that the tape was edited to make him look foolish, but no, he did that on his own. The raw footage proves he is untruthful, and it will be interesting to see how long it takes atheists/evolutionists to admit that Dawkins has a character problem. He appears to be “honesty deficient.”

My critic wrote, “So, again, let’s not just say ‘We dunno, God did it!’ Let’s be scientists and study it instead shall we?” Well, since God really did do it, are we not obligated to say, “God did it”? It is not very scientific to declare an untruth as a truth as atheists and evolutionists do all the while proclaiming how “scientific” they are. Evolutionists want to study the Darwinian Myth and they will study how it happened, when it happened but not if it happened.

What turned objective, honest scientists into propagandists, publicists, and promoters of the false religion of evolution?
———-
Dr. Don Boys is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives, author of 13 books, frequent guest on television and radio talk shows, and wrote columns for USA Today for 8 years His most recent book is ISLAM: America’s Trojan Horse! His websites are www.cstnews.com and www.Muslimfact.com.)

Boys’ columns are copyrighted and may be republished, reposted, or emailed providing the person or organization doing so does not charge for subscriptions or advertising and the column is copied intact and the tag at the end in parentheses is included intact.

Fair Use: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in my efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site/blog for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.