-By John Armor
The greatest single piece of dance music ever written is The Blue Danube by Johann Strauss. It appears at a critical point in three movies, all favorites of mine. In each case it demonstrates the emotional power of the right music at the right time in the plot.
The first movie is an obvious use. Yul Brynner dances with Ingrid Bergman toward the end of Anastasia to this waltz. This occurs at the point where he begins to see that the woman he was grooming to pretend to be the surviving Anastasia, might actually be that surviving member of the assassinated Romanov family.
This movie has been remade twice since 1956, once straight and once as, of all things, a cartoon. Why do any studios, producers and directors persist in remaking classic films that are already the best of type? Nothing good can come of it. Does anyone remember the remake of Hitchcock’s Psycho? I hope not.
Many films of many types use music to build the emotions and increase the meaning of the critical scenes. This is standard procedure in modern films. But Alfred Hitchcock was the first director to fully understand this point and to design the right music for all his films.
In the best use of music it is more than just chewing gum for the ears. Nor is it the cheap theatrics of music recognized as threatening is routinely used when someone is about to be dispatched with a machete, chain saw, or whatever.
The second use of The Blue Danube involves a pair of non-human dancers. Stanley Kubrick’s masterpiece, 2001, a Space Odyssey, was deliberately edited by Kubrick to match the classical music which was his score. The film had minimal dialogue and used music to tell much of the story.
The scene with the waltz appears early in the film, as the Pan Am space shuttle is approaching the great wheel of the space station. As the perspective switches from a fixed point of reference, to inside the shuttle, to inside the space station, and back, The Blue Danube plays in the background. It is clear that this is in fact a dance, and that death is the consequence if the dance is not executed perfectly.
The final example is an obscure film by Baz Luhrmann in 1992, called Strictly Ballroom. This film is, at one time, a documentary about ballroom dancing, a wickedly funny comedy, a touching tragedy, a love story between a young boy and girl, and a story of a father and son reunited. As you might expect, in such a movie, The Blue Danube appears repeatedly.
It appears in a major key when the characters are first introduced, before dancer Scott Hastings, in the middle of a contest routine, breaks away from the traditional forms and begins dancing his “new steps.” At other points in the movie, the Danube appears in a minor key at disastrous turns before the final denouement.
If you have not seen this movie, I recommend that you catch it on the Independent Film Channel, or through your preferred purveyor of small but excellent films on DVD. Do that right away, before you forget.
Of course, most excellent films today use music well and not just as an afterthought. Here are two others in which the music is not merely background but a character in the play. The first is Waking Ned Devine, an Irish film from 1998, in which the breaking of a violin string is a critical turning point of the plot.
Then, there is Say Amen, Somebody, a 1982 documentary about the creation of gospel music singing. When you watch this film and reach the song lyric Jesus Dropped the Charges, I expect you to send an e-mail thanking me for the recommendation of an excellent film.
Well, so much for discussing music with mere words. Next week we go back to talking about politics with mere logic.
____________
John Armor is a graduate of Yale, and Maryland Law School, and has 33 years practice at law in the US Supreme Court. Mr. Armor has authored seven books and over 750 articles. Armor happily lives on a mountaintop in the Blue Ridge. He can be reached at: John_Armor@aya.yale.edu
Fair Use: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in my efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site/blog for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.