Hillary’s Opponents Shrink From Attacking Her

-By Gary Krasner

The MSM is clearly blacklisting most of the Clinton scandals. But we can’t let her political opponents off the hook—-Bernie, and even Trump.

Trump has a feast to choose from. Of the two articles I am citing (Is Bill Clinton A Sexual Predator Or Just A Sex Addict? and
Hillary Helps a Bank–and Then It Funnels Millions to the Clintons), I chose the current scandal in which Bill flew to pedophile island where young teens are held prisoner for the purpose of Bill and friend Epstein to rape them.

Democrats have a method when republicans do bad things. They ask OTHER republicans–who are not involved in the bad deed–if they would condemn the accused for his bad deed.

It’s a trap question. If you don’t condemn, then you appear to condone the (alleged) bad behavior. If you condemn, then Dems succeeded in isolating and destroying a republican (the accused).

It matters not whether the allegation is true. It matters not that the accused acted alone. Dems and MSM make every republican responsible for the alleged deed, just by being in the same party.

DUMDUM Trump, the novice apprentice in politics, is unaware of this tactic. It’s obvious, because he has a wealth of opportunities to adopt that tactic against Hillary, to isolate and destroy her.

“Madam Secretary, do you condemn Bill Clinton’s rape of children, and his use of taxpayer funds to have the Secret Service accompany him to the island (21 times) where the rapes occurred?”

A simple question, yet MSM will never utter it. But why doesn’t Trump? He commands MSM attention. He could employ that Alinsky tactic. He’s a Dummy, that’s why. And dummies support him.

Crazy Bernie is no different. Hillary even dared him during the debates to cite a specific instance where she was corrupt. He couldn’t. He just stood there looking stupid. See the second article.

Hillary has her own tactic as well. It’s been very successful in making men cower and shrink from attacking her. You can see it used anytime someone asks her a question she can’t answer.

Questions about Bill’s rapes, or the Clinton Foundation frauds, or her private server. Her first response is one of outrage and disgust. She expresses shock to dismiss the question as irrelevant.

That first reaction–where she raises her voice and shows impatience and annoyance, tends to make people–especially men–to retreat into silence or back down. They don’t followup.

We saw this recently when “journalist” Jorge Ramos asked her if she would continue campaigning if she gets indicted. Surrounded by Hillary acolytes, poor Jorge’s testicles shrunk.

We saw it last Fall during the Benghazi hearings, where Hillary barked at Senator Johnson: “What difference, at this point, does it make?!!!!!!!” The senator’s balls shrunk.

Why do men cower at her feigned outrage?! Me? I know I’ve won a debate when I see a woman flounder and dodge an answer. That’s when I go in for the kill. (But then I’m not married.)

But Hillary’s shock and annoyance tactic only works on the first question. If the questioner pursues with a followup, Hillary would look cranky and ill-mannered to continue that act.

So Jorge could have said, “So, you’re saying that you WILL continue campaigning while indicted?” And Johnson: “It makes a great deal of difference, Madam Secretary, when Americans get killed!”

But enough about my sex fantasies. Like most of them, nothing will come of these challenges to Hillary. Speaking of sex, today, some gal named Brewer Lane spoke up for Trump.

She said that the NY Times misrepresented her comments about Trump, alleging he treated her like a sex object. A major hit piece, to be sure, refuted by the gal who was involved.

Do you see the fraud? NY Times had to reach back half a century to come up with an instance in which Trump acted like a normal male (she insisted he acted like a gentleman!).

Yet Bill Clinton raped dozens of women, and graduated now to raping children, while the Secret Service looked on. A former president, with his spouse running for president!

Where’s the front page coverage? Hillary enabled a serial rapist–warrants no news coverage. Trump allegedly acted like a sexist on a date 50 yrs ago–wall to wall media coverage today.

Where’s the Hillary “shock and outrage” over that?


Copyright Publius Forum 2001