Feminist Criminal Decides to Abort Her Son Solely Because He is Male

-By Warner Todd Huston

A revelatory posting by a hate-filled, radical feminist calling herself “Lana” recently appeared on the extremist website called “Injustice Stories.” The story ostensibly tells the tale of how “Lana” aborted her baby because she found out that the child was a boy. “Lana” says she killed her baby because she didn’t want to bring another male “monster” into the world. And she is proud of her decision.

The posting detailing Lana’s story on what led her to abort her baby is disgusting, certainly, but it does nicely describe the logical end game of feminism: the genocide of the male of the species.

The story appears on a site where “hatred is not allowed” but this is obviously a convenient lie because “Lana’s” post is entirely based on abject hate for men. Of course, we know why the story was allowed. It’s because “Lana” claims to be an oppressed female who is fighting “injustice” when in reality all she is, is a proto Nazi advocating a form of eugenics.

In any case, what we have here is the story of a mentally ill woman who murdered her baby for the sole reason that he is male. Sadly, her reasoning is poof that feminism has nothing at all to do with “equality” and ultimately simply breeds unthinking hatred for men.

One caveat. Since this is all essentially anonymous we must acknowledge that the whole story may be a fraud. The main reason I believe it is real, though, is that the story is shot through with perfectly formed feminist foolishness and reeks of the words of a woman who has been immersed in the sort of clap trap that passes for feminist intellectualism taught in our useless colleges. If this piece is a scam it was written by someone who is thoroughly familiar with feminist theory and its buzzwords. But the casual way in which it was written leads me to believe it is real. Still, be warned about what we have here.

Lana’s story starts out revealing that she got pregnant by a “donator” with whom she has no relationship. Still, she felt she would be a “good mother-like figure” for the baby and decided to keep it.

From the beginning she assumed the baby would be a girl. Regardless, though, Lana prepared a “gender neutral” environment so that her baby girl could pick her own gender identity. She “did not want outside influences affecting what gender she would ultimately become.”

Lana also looked into girl-only day care so that “no man will be around to hurt her progress, no boys there to demean her or call her names” as she grew.

This is all perfectly formed college nonsense about child-rearing.

Before we get to the shock Lana experienced once she found out the gender of the baby, she also described an incident she supposedly had with a man on a plane.

Lana describes a flight she had where she told a male passenger that she was headed to an Occupy Wall Street event. She says he called her a bitch. “Stunned, I screamed “ASSAULT!” she wrote.

Having been inculcated in college that a feminist claiming “assault” can get whatever she wants, Lana was shocked when the airline wouldn’t simply bow to her supposed grievance and force the man to move to a different seat. The steward and stewardess pressed her on whether or not the man actually assaulted her physically. What she wrote is also perfectly indicative of college indoctrination.

Her response to the man and what she saw as the “betrayal” of the airline is classic college speak:

For a moment, I contemplated bending the truth in order to get the woman-hater away from me. His words had violated both my feelings, and my trust, perhaps as much of a violation as actual physical touch. In the end, I confirmed that no physical contact was made, to which both flight attendants told me they couldn’t make him move.

I was flabbergasted, and then betrayed as they recommended that I move to one of the empty seats. This left me in tears. I knew the only way to get away was to move seats so I did so tearfully and having felt as though I had been verbally and emotionally raped.

By the time we landed, my outlook had changed, I could no longer depend on men to be an ally of the cause.

Notice all the left-wing crap here? Lying is OK if it serves to push the feminist line, mere words are considered the same as “physical assault,” any denial of what feminists want is a “betrayal” of all that is good and holy, people refusing to give in is “just like rape,” and ultimately one denial of what a feminist wants is “proof” that no man in the world can be trusted.

This reductionist nonsense is what is taught to our children by “feminist studies,” a field that should be aborted as a miscarriage of education.

Anyway, Lana was eventually told by her doctor that she was carrying a boy. What she did is the only logical end that can be realized with feminism theology.

She starts with this victomology garbage.

My home became my prison and my fetus became my warden the next 48 hours. Crying, sobbing, uncontrollable weeping, mental anguish the likes of which may only be experienced by those who have had their lives destroyed by war, I was a refugee, and my home was my refugee camp, an unfamiliar place that was just….sheltering me.

And goes on to describe her decision.

By the third day, I started regaining some of my mental strength and knew what I had to do. I couldn’t bring another monster into the world. We already have enough enemies as it is. It didn’t matter that I would be raising a son, he would still come into contact with boys, men, perhaps even the suit jockey who would inevitably twist his carefully constructed upbringing with their kindness. He would think “These men aren’t so bad, why would mom say that they are holding me down?”

…But I knew what I had to do.

A few days later, I went in for the procedure, as it was fairly later in my pregnancy, I was aware there were certain risks, but it went off without a hitch. My body’s betrayal was no more, I was free, and for the first time since the airplane incident, I felt strong. I had done something positive, something that would actually make a difference, something good, even though as I would find out, many others wouldn’t see it that way.

Even more disgusting, this murdering monster reported that she now has a baby girl and will raise the girl to hate men just like she does.

She ended saying, “I stand by my decision to abort my baby because it was a male” and that “if the curse returns” she would do so again.

She also lies saying “I don’t hate men.” This is a lie. She calls men every manner of name and even called her own unborn son a “curse.”

Essentially she murdered her child because she felt some guy on a plane was a jerk. Presumably she would hate the idea that women in China or India abort girls because in those societies girls are wanted less than boys. But what she has done–abort a boy because to her a boy is less desirable–is no different at all.

What Lana practiced is a form of eugenics based on hatred, no different than what the Nazis did, no different than the genocide of blacks that Margaret Sanger wanted. And Lana learned this hate in college. This advocacy of hate is taught as a legitimate filed of study.

In a second post Lana expressed shock that people were attacking her for murdering her baby boy based solely on the fact that he was male. Here is how she ended that posting:

I find it hard to hate anybody, their faults are not their own, but usually rather the product of an environment or social circle they have been exposed to. I beg most of you, for your own good, take a look at yourself and decide right now if you want to spend the rest of your life angry on the internet, or if you want to fight for a woman’s right to do what she wants with her body.

Did you notice the intellectual dishonesty in this statement? She first claimed that she can’t hate someone for their faults because they are a “product of an environment or social circle.” And yet, she murdered her baby well before he ever had a chance to be influenced by any environment or social circle.

This is the intellectual disconnect this mentally ill woman has been inundated with in college. Her every justification is based on her feeeeelings and not intellectual rigor. Her feelings that she has some sort of shadowy right to “do what she wants with her own body” trumps the right of her baby to do what it wants with its body. She denies her own hate of men yet defends her right to kill male babies because she has been told that men are evil and her actions are justified quite despite how they clash with her supposedly deeply held ideals of rights and self-definition.

All of these lies, all of this hatred, all of this justification of murder, it’s all pure feminism taught in schools. Lana has become the perfect baby murdering, man-hating feminist.

And she is the perfect example of why our institutions of higher learning need to be torn down and rebuilt to excise the far left influence that has destroyed our country and perverted America.
“The only end of writing is to enable the reader better to enjoy life, or better to endure it.”
–Samuel Johnson

Follow Warner Todd Huston on:

Warner Todd Huston is a Chicago based freelance writer. He has been writing news, opinion editorials and social criticism since early 2001 and before that wrote articles on U.S. history for several American history magazines. Huston is a featured writer for Andrew Breitbart’s Breitbart News, and he appears on such sites as RightWingNews.com, CanadaFreePress.com, Wizbang.com, and many, many others. Huston has also appeared on Fox News, Fox Business Network, CNN, and many local TV shows as well as numerous talk radio shows throughout the country.

For a full bio, please CLICK HERE.

Copyright Publius Forum 2001