-By Dan Scott
Since the Climategate story has been broken over a week ago, we have begun to see the cracks in the AGW edifice. George Monbiot, an AGW proponent has called for the resignation of Phil Jones from the IPCC. Source The emails implicated Phil Jones, Michael Mann and Stefan Rahmstorf in a scheme to rig the Peer Review process to only allow pro-AGW papers through while banning anything remotely unfavorable regardless of any inconvenient facts. Both Messrs. Monbiot’s and Zorita’s desire to toss the high profile offenders under the bus are purely self serving, since the sacrifice of Jones, Mann and Rahmstorf is merely a means to claim isolated individual overzealousness in an attempt to distract the public from the real issue regarding the wholesale scientific fraud of AGW.
We have corroborating proof regarding the rigged Peer Review process from the personal account of Vincent Gray, PhD. His experience shows any paper with unfriendly AGW leanings were sent to file 13. It should be noted that another famous hurricane researcher by the same last name, Professor William Gray lost his funding for Hurricane research because of his stance against AGW. There is no denying the obvious when it comes to being politically incorrect regarding AGW. Science was supposed to be a debate of theories, not the suppression of facts to support the theory du jour.
However, it looks like the dam has finally broken on this issue, now scientists with suspicions, inside information and doubts about AGW are beginning to come forward. Here’s the deal for you scientists who have any knowledge about scientific fraud or questionable unethical conduct, the last one to come forward will be held guilty of aiding and abetting a fraud. Once the government is faced with mounting evidence of widespread fraud, they will have no choice but to begin indicting those who took government grants (in the billions) under false pretenses – that’s called fraud. Your only hope of avoiding defending yourself against expensive litigation and being swept up in politician’s attempts to throw you under the bus to save themselves is to blow the whistle now.
President Obama has a long track record of distancing himself successfully from scandals by letting others take the fall. Didn’t you notice Governor Blagojevich take all the heat in the attempted sale of the Illinois Senate Seat? Do you really believe he was oblivious to what was going on? Past is prologue, Obama threw Rev. Wright under the bus, a man whom he admired for 20 years in order to become president, what makes you think he won’t throw you under the bus to save himself and his presidency? Take note of the lesson the bankers and brokers (major campaign contributors to Democrats) learned in the economic debacle, the politicians (Obama, Schumer, Frank, and Dodd) promptly threw their campaign contributors under the bus to save themselves.
The Obama Express Bus has a schedule to keep, get out of the street or you will find yourself promptly run over. The only way to avoid the inevitable trip to the emergency room is to speak up now before he claims innocence at your expense.
———-
Dan Scott calls himself a “Member of the Global Capitalist Cabal preaching Capitalism and personal responsibility as the economic solution to world poverty.” He is also a member of the 14th Amendment Society — victimhood is a liberal code word for denying the civil rights of others. He is also a proud member of the Global Warming Denier Cabal, insisting that facts not agendas determine the truth.
Dan can be reached for comments at dscott8186@yahoo.com.
Fair Use: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in my efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site/blog for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
In the ethical exercise of journalism to avoid the appearance of impropriety due to a conflict of interest, this blogger discloses that I receive no direct monetary reward or compensation or in kind gifts for the views I express. This is to demonstrate ethical conduct unlike Congress whose Quid Pro Quo legislation benefits their campaign contributors and in some cases themselves directly.
Additionally, the funding for this website is from individual contributions and revenue from advertisers without regard to specific content.