**Now with Updates**
-By Warner Todd Huston
Only a few months ago, Representative Mark Kirk voted for Cap and Tax… er, I mean Cap and Trade. Conservatives and Republicans in general lit into Kirk with a vengeance. Then he started running for the Senate and at a subsequent September 5 campaign stop he reversed himself and decided he wouldn’t support Cap and Trade.
Kirk is not a strong pro-life supporter, he is bad on the Second Amendment, Kirk is only middling on free trade, and he has drifted back and forth on sometimes support for Obama’s left-wing, big spending agenda in Washington.. though he is sometimes good on national defense. In all, Kirk is not quite as bad as N.Y. 23’s Dede Scozzafava, but he is no Illinois Dough Hoffman if you want a current analogy.
Now comes a November 4 report by the Washington Post’s Chris Cillizza that Kirk sent a memo to Fred Malek attempting to get Governor Sarah Palin’s endorsement for his (Kirk’s) Senate run. Cillizza claims that this Kirk request shows Palin’s power and Kirk’s worries for his campaign.
Kirk’s memo is tangible evidence of the power of Palin’s endorsement in a Republican primary. Kirk, a moderate by voting record in the House, is clearly very concerned about the negative impact a Palin endorsement of one of his primary opponents could have on his chances at being the party’s nominee for the seat being vacated by appointed Sen. Roland Burris (D).
However, it is obvious by actually reading the memo that Cillizza is taking liberties with his claim that Kirk pleaded for Palin’s support. The truth is that Kirk was far more cagey with his memo.
Memorandum
November 3, 2009
To: Fred Malek
From: Mark Kirk
Re: Gov. Palin Visit to Chicago November 16thGovernor Palin is scheduled to appear on Oprah November 16th in Chicago. The Chicago media will focus on one key issue: does Gov. Palin oppose Congressman Mark Kirk’s bid to take the Obama Senate seat for the Republicans?
We would hope Gov. Palin could say something quick and decisive:
Voters in Illinois have a key opportunity to take Barack Obama’s senate seat. Congressman Kirk is the lead candidate to do that. Kirk, the first member of Congress to deploy into combat since 1942, voted against the Stimulus, Omnibus and Pelosi health care bills. He announced he will oppose Cap & Trade and is the key House national security hawk on Iran. Kirk is a unique Republican candidate who has become the number one pro-Israel fundraiser in America, Republican or Democrat.
As Rich Miller notes, the memo concludes with some talking points on Kirk’s record.
Kirk’s memo is a bit more cagey than an outright request for an endorsement. It is a bit more like a “challenge” to Palin to support Kirk as opposed to a n outright request. Still, it does, indeed, show that Kirk was angling for Palin’s endorsement despite that Miller thinks it isn’t. But I agree with Miller’s conclusion that Kirk cannot seem to decide what he “is.” I’ve noted Kirk’s flip flopping in the past myself, but if you look at his record you see him often splitting his vote between left and right, so his yo yoing has been evident in his record since day one. We are only now seeing it in the glaring lights of the campaign trail.
In the end, I am not sure if you can say that Kirk has a consistently one sided philosophy. He seems to just drift wildly from one side to the other — granted his course seems steered on the center left more often than his spikes to the right or far left. The guy is just all over the map. That’s all there is to it.
Below, Kirk’s Cap and Trade flip flop (about three minutes into the video):
Another interesting aspect of this whole Palin/Kirk connection is that back in October of 2008, Kirk was saying he wouldn’t have picked Palin as McCain’s VP and wondered if she were even qualified to take the number 2 spot on the ticket.
**UPDATE**
Kirk’s opponent for the GOP nomination for the Senate has spoken out about this little situation. Naturally, Patrick Hughes is ridiculing Kirk’s seeming pleading for Palin’s support. (As reported on MSNBC)
“I believe Mark Kirk, who has consistently supported President Obama’s legislative agenda, including cap and trade legislation, is quickly realizing that Republican Primary voters do not share his extreme views,” Hughes said in a statement released by his campaign. “In a desperate attempt to prove otherwise, he is seeking the endorsement of Sarah Palin, a true Reagan conservative, to help disguise his liberal voting record.”
As to his own contact with TeamSarah, Hughes said:
“We have been in contact with Sarah PAC and many other conservative PACs,” said Laura Grock, spokeswoman for Hughes. None has offered help YET, “but would graciously accept the support of a true Reagan Conservative like Sarah Palin,” Grock said.
(Cross posted at RedCounty.com.)
____________
Warner Todd Huston is a Chicago based freelance writer, has been writing opinion editorials and social criticism since early 2001 and is featured on many websites such as RightWingNews.com, CanadaFreePress.com, StoptheACLU.com, TheRealityCheck.org, RedState.com, Human Events Magazine, AmericanDailyReview.com, and the New Media Journal, among many, many others. Additionally, he has been a frequent guest on talk-radio programs to discuss his opinion editorials and current events and is currently the co-host of “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Conservatism” heard on BlogTalkRadio. Warner is also the editor of the Cook County Page for RedCounty.com.
He has also written for several history magazines and appears in the new book “Americans on Politics, Policy and Pop Culture” which can be purchased on amazon.com. He is also the owner and operator of PubliusForum.com. Feel free to contact him with any comments or questions : EMAIL Warner Todd Huston
Fair Use: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in my efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site/blog for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.