-By John Armor
It was just a minor story on Friday about a Dutch politician being denied entry to Britain at a London airport. You might well have missed it. But it was an extremely important event for its broader meaning.
Geert Wilders, a member of the Netherlands parliament, was invited to Britain by a member of the House ot Lords. The invitation asked Wilders to show his 17-minute film “Fitna,” which he made last year. Fitna juxtaposes quotes from the Koran with images of Islamofascists attacking and murdering various non-Muslims.
Last year there were riots around the world by Muslims against this “anti-Islamic” film. None of the protesters claimed that the quotes from the Koran were inaccurate, nor that the murders and assaults depicted were in any way inaccurate.
The day before Wilders was to fly to London, British Home Secretary Jacqui Smith told Wilders not to come because “his opinions would threaten security.” Wilders made the trip anyway, and was arrested at the airport in London and put on another flight back to Amsterdam. While he was on the ground in London, he condemned Britain for stopping him. He called the British government “the biggest bunch of cowards in Europe.”
Why should we care about what seems to be a minor dust-em-up at a London airport? It is because all Western governments are in various forms of retreat from the truth about the Islamofascists, because the murderers themselves and their millions of Muslim enablers will burn cars and buildings, attack police and civilians in return for anyone speaking the truth about them.
Two recent examples of such retreats from the truth to appease the friends of the murderers happened in the UN, and in the US. The UN has just taken under consideration a speech code which would define as “anti-Islamic” any criticism of Muslims or Muslim governments. The Nazis and the Communists certainly would have preferred such a resolution respectively in the League of Nations, or the UN. But neither the Nazis nor the Communists had the high number of corrupt governments to vote in their favor, as the Muslims do today.
The other example of retreat from the truth happened in the US last week when President Obama spoke to the national prayer breakfast. He claimed this in that lightly covered speech: “But no matter what we choose to believe, let us remember that there is no religion whose central tenet is hate. There is no God who condones taking the life of an innocent human being. This much we know.”
Well, any one who “knows” that “fact” is a brass-plated, geopolitical moron. If you go back far enough in history, all of the world’s major religions have at some time supported the murder of thousands of men, women and children who were of different backgrounds. And all of those religions have, at those times, claimed that their respective gods were in favor of those slaughters.
Most of the world’s major religions have become more civilized as the centuries have passed. All except Islam, which is stuck in 7th century, and still justifies the murder of non-believers.
None of us should pretend that the truth is not true, and pretend that the political and religious leaders of Islam are “just like us (sorta).” We are facing millions of mass murderers, and hundreds of millions of supporters and enablers of those murderers. Pretending that they are not there, and do not intend what they repeatedly say and write in public, will solve nothing. Ir will cause more of us to be murdered.
It is wrong to call the Islamofascists animals, because they are much worse than that. Animals kill to eat, and occasionally kill rivals during mating season. They do not kill at random and in large numbers.
It is right to call the Islamofascists “beardless cowards.” (Look up a history of Islamic insults to know what that means.) It is right to call the Islamofascists rabid dogs. And is the proper way to deal with them is like rabid dogs. Find and kill them as efficiently as possible to prevent more harm to civilized nations, and to civilized people who live in uncivilized nations.
To any Muslims who take offense at that, I say, your complaints are rejected. Get back to me when you become competent human beings, if you are capable of that.
____________
John Armor is a graduate of Yale, and Maryland Law School, and has 33 years practice at law in the US Supreme Court. Mr. Armor has authored seven books and over 750 articles. Armor happily lives on a mountaintop in the Blue Ridge. He can be reached at: John_Armor@aya.yale.edu
Fair Use: This site may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material available in my efforts to advance understanding of political, human rights, economic, democracy, and social justice issues, etc. I believe this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research, educational, or satirical purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site/blog for purposes of your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.