Collateralized Debt Obligations, The CDO Menace

-By Dan Scott

When the discussion turns to financial instruments people’s eyes glaze over due to the complexity of the issue. However, in this case what you don’t understand or rather what you don’t know can hurt you. Congress and the Whitehouse at this point have focused on a plan that supposedly will solve the credit lock threatening the economy with Recession. The problem is the solution proposed doesn’t address the cause but the symptoms. The upshot is while this solution will work it will only do so in a very short time frame, leaving the underlying problem unresolved and festering. Unfortunately, it may take the fall of Wells Fargo, Citicorp and HSBC who literally own TRILLIONS of dollars in CDO derivatives to finally bring Congress and the Whitehouse to their senses. Bears Stearns and Lehman Brothers already paid the price of inaction. I’m not optimistic about any of the current batch of politicians in power actually acting proactively, their track record speaks otherwise.

The Bush Administration for years has been warning about the potential of the lending abuses by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Unfortunately, their warnings have been too technical, understood by only those in the financial arena. Combined with the incompetence of Rep. Barney Frank (D) and Sen. Christopher Dodd (D) the problem was not resolved and in fact the solutions were repeatedly rebuffed. Even Sen. Barack Obama in 2005 failed to grasp the issues when reforms were repeatedly requested, he dutifully voted the Democrat Party Line as an Order Taker against reform. He opposed CHANGE in the favor of the STATUS QUO. His response thus far in 2008 is more Order Taking. What was his response about going back to Washington to work out a bipartisan compromise? He said to paraphrase, I can fly to Washington for the vote and then return in time for the debate. A leader is involved in negotiations, an order taker settles with the results.

During the VP debate, both Joseph Biden and Sarah Palin attributed the current credit lock mess to the greed of Wall Street. Nice simple sound bite, an easy group to demonize and as usual the sound bite is wrong. The sound bite should have been the Democrats with their meddling have once again damaged the economy. Unfortunately, as we listened to the rapid fire stream of talking points from Biden, few if any of them reflected reality. It is so easy to make unfounded assertions and it’s very time consuming to debunk them all that it is not possible in a debate format to rebut a laundry list of myths and falsehoods, and that’s why talking points work. All truths are assertions of facts, but not all assertions of fact are truth. Selectively recounting the facts to sell an agenda is lying or commonly referred to as “sales talk”. Joe Biden was nothing more than a slick used car salesman selling a lemon.

Many months ago back in February, bloggers were discussing the issue of mortgages and CDOs. Of course the MSM ignored the significance of the issues regarding the proposed $150 billion bailout discussed at the time given their pushing the Democrat Party line for the primaries and elections. The MSM kept quiet about the coming mortgage crisis and now also with the ensuing CDO crisis because they knew who was to blame. Even as far back as 1999, the MSM knew there was a problem and refused to push Democrats every time the issue of reform came up. Surprise, surprise, the MSM being the mouthpiece of the Democrat Party selectively reported the facts and thus lulled the public into a false state of complacency through their emphasis of the news.

Here are some facts the MSM has been mostly mum on explaining the mortgage crisis and why it hurts you. In order for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (FMs) to purchase a home mortgage two things must happen. First the FMs set out the conditions under which they will purchase a home mortgage from a bank. If the loan doesn’t meet the conditions the bank can’t sell the loan to them. In order for the FMs to buy your home mortgage from a bank, they have to get the money from somewhere, it doesn’t appear out of thin air. The FMs sell a financial instrument called Collateralized Debt Obligation in the open market to investors (the so called greedy people on Wall Street) to raise that cash. Think of the CDO as bond representing hundreds of mortgages packaged together with the inducement of receiving an income. Literally trillions of dollars of CDOs have been sold by the FMs to on the market. The value of any CDO is based on the value of the home mortgages so when people default on their mortgage, the value of the CDO drops because the interest income that was supposed to be paid out to the investors has also dropped. The more mortgages that go into default the lower the value of the CDO. To protect against this the investors turned around and bought an insurance policy to protect themselves against inordinate mortgage defaults (called derivatives). The problem for the financial markets is this, when too many mortgages default at the same time thus causing a run on those companies who issued the insurance (derivatives) they are forced into insolvency and can’t meet their obligations. When this happens, the entire system which is based upon trust collapses in a cascade of financial institution defaults.

The investors trusted the FMs because they were a Government Sponsored Agency (GSA) but instead were duped by them. The FMs were busted on rigging the books which is where Franklin Raines comes into the picture, a supporter and advisor for Barack Obama. As you can see it took me a lengthy paragraph to debunk the sound bite that it was the greed of Wall Street that got us into this mess when in fact it was the arrogance of the Democrat Party’s social engineering imposing their world view at the expense of the markets. Without the markets, you and I can not get loans to buy houses, cars and business can’t get loans to stock the store shelves or invest in new equipment.

However, it wasn’t just bad mortgage policy by the FMs that got us here, the straw that broke the camel’s back was the rapid rise of energy prices from 2006 to current time. The rise in oil prices was so fast that the economy didn’t have time to adjust and compensate thus throwing people out of work. The debacle in the mortgage market ran a parallel path with the run up in energy prices. People were loosing their jobs thus making it difficult for them to pay their mortgages. What really occurred was high gasoline prices and the initial mortgage defaults happened together to push the economy over the edge by starting a bank run to create a credit lock.

Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid promised to lower gasoline prices in the 2006 elections, did they deliver? NO, they foolishly insisted on keeping the drilling ban restricting supply and thus driving up the cost of oil. When the fast run up of energy prices rippled through the economy, it cascaded against the low wage unskilled earners. Without a job, you can’t pay the mortgage, this is why renting is a far better option for people at the low end of economic ladder. If you loose your job and can’t pay the rent you move in with someone else, there is very little long term financial consequence. However, when you own a home and can’t meet the monthly payment, there are severe financial consequences and ten years of a bad credit record insuring high interest rates for them in the future. As we have repeatedly noted, the financial meltdown was totally avoidable if reforms were put in place back in 2005 on the FMs. Without those reforms more people with low FICO scores were holding mortgages than there should have been. People with low FICO scores are normally the first people who experience layoffs during a slowing economy. People with FICO scores from 590 to 630 are 51% to 31%, respectively, likely to default on their obligations. Being at the bottom of the economic ladder they tend to work in areas that are highly subject to the contraction of discretionary spending. What Democrats in their hubris overlooked is as you climb the economic ladder you become more able to handle the consequences of home ownership, they put the cart before the horse. Contrary to demonizing the banks for giving people loans they couldn’t afford, it was Democrats who literally set these people up for failure via the Community Reinvestment Act.

After the failure of Bears Stearns, Charles Schumer caused the bank run on Indymac by publicly questioning the solvency of Indymac. As you know most banks have 90% of their assets in loans (that’s how they make their money) and about 10% in cash. It doesn’t take much of run to push a bank into insolvency under the accounting rules when you have a 10 to 1 ratio to maintain. Once the public was spooked by word of Indymac’s potential failure (under the rules), a herd mentality set in causing runs on bank after bank. As each bank’s failure was breathlessly reported by the MSM fear was reinforced to pull more deposits out of other banks. Banks were forced to conserve (hoard) cash and could not lend to other banks to make up their cash shortfall. Thus the credit lock.

Connecting the dots:

California’s attorney general is reviewing a request by former employees of IndyMac Bancorp Inc to investigate whether a New York senator triggered the bank’s collapse by releasing confidential information.

At issue is a much-publicized letter that Chuck Schumer, a Democrat, sent in June to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp (FDIC) and Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) questioning the company’s ability to survive.

The FDIC took control of IndyMac on July 11 after depositors withdrew more than $1.3 billion over 11 days. It was the third-largest bank failure in U.S. history. At the time, OTS Director John Reich blamed Schumer’s letter for causing the run on the bank.

In a letter to Attorney General Jerry Brown last week, 51 former IndyMac workers wrote: “From the day (Schumer’s) letter was made public on June 26 until the closure of the bank, a run on the bank took place and the failure became inevitable.”

At this all the FDIC can do is continue to supply money to spooked depositors as they withdraw their cash to a point when these people will regain faith in the system. WaMu and Wachovia were just more victims of a spooked public with which the FDIC had to deal. The solutions which would address the mortgages losses at their source – LOWER the price of energy by domestic drilling which will: a) the futures market will react to drive down the price of oil, in turn lowering the cost of gasoline, b) lower the cost of living so people can make there payments so they are less likely to default, c) expand the economy to increase job creation and d) bring in billions of dollars into the Federal and State Treasuries without the burden of extra taxation. Secondly, a de facto moratorium on new home construction by requiring 20% down and a high FICO score in the 700s. Together, with a coordinated policy insuring the mortgages to support the CDO valuations seems to be the only solution, otherwise it’s let the house of cards fall and then rebuild from the ashes. Will the politicians listen and do the right thing? Not really, just look at their track record and what they have been voting on in Congress. One only needs to listen to Nancy Pelosi’s speech before the procedural vote to realize they won’t, as she promised there would be an investigation into the causes of the current crisis specifically by the very people who caused it like Rep. Barney Frank. Like we are really going to get to the truth of the matter with such people!
———-
Dan Scott calls himself a “Member of the Global Capitalist Cabal preaching Capitalism and personal responsibility as the economic solution to world poverty.” He is also a member of the 14th Amendment Society — victimhood is a liberal code word for denying the civil rights of others. He is also a proud member of the Global Warming Denier Cabal, insisting that facts not agendas determine the truth.

Dan can be seen on the web at http://www.geocities.com/fightbigotry2002/ as well as http://www.geocities.com/dscott8186/saidwebpage.htm, And can be reached for comments at dscott8186@yahoo.com.


4 thoughts on “Collateralized Debt Obligations, The CDO Menace”

  1. Folks, the downdraft has begun a world wide recession is in the offing because Congress adjourned without passing a proper response to a crisis they created.

    Hypo Real Estate, Germany’s second largest real estate lender, teeters on the verge of collapse. The bank has a €400 billion balance sheet, which would make for a failure of a similar scale to Lehman’s (Hypo’s footings are roughly $550 billion, while Lehman’s were $660 billion as of its last balance sheet date).

    http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2008/10/hypo-bank-rescue-fails-threatening.html

  2. Just a clarification about CDOs in layman’s term, there was an intermediate step I left out between the FMs and Lehman Brothers in creating CDOs. However, that step doesn’t materially change what I said.

    FMs produced MBS – mortgage backed securities which they sold to institutions like Lehmans and others. Lehmans and others created the CDO and paired them with various hedges. As for the general size, 100 million seemed to be a general number, but anything from 10 mil up. In many cases similar type loans from across a broad region to give them diversity. Others, all from the same region but different type loans. The MBSs could have sub-prime all the way up to prime and jumbo loans in their mix.

    Things to remember: defaults were expected in any MBS. From what I could determine, .2% would seemed to have been average. When defaults passed .5% they became very concerned. Although the default rate is much higher within specific MBS, the rate is maybe 2% in average ones. There are others that are just falling apart.

    The problem is not the defaults per se. In many cases, the losses are minimal. A small MBS might have only 10-15 loans within it. The problem is the hedges and CDOs. Often, as a general rule, the CDO’s were highly leveraged, 10 to 1 was standard, but 30 to 1 was all too common. A 2% default results in a massive loss at 30 to 1 and THAT is the issue. It is bad enough that the CDOs are leveraged, but in most cases, there was NO or very little capital reserve – often derivatives or hedges took the place of capital. Once those started failing, we had a cascade that is only now just getting going.

    So, you get ten, $10 mil MBS, packaged into a $100mil CDO that is purchased with only $3 million. A 3% loss in the CDO wipes out the position. Hence the reluctance of anyone to part with paper showing ANY loss. Many MBS that have been selling have been selling in the 80-85% range – that wipes out even the 10 to 1 leverages. Some of the fire sales on CDOs and MBS have been in the 20 cent range.

    The other problem is where you have the essence right: because of the defaults, pricing the MBS has been all but impossible. If all methods of pricing consider defaults less than .5%, what happens when defaults double that?…what is an appropriate price? And hence, the issue with the bailout and mark to market. Who is going to decide what is the right price to purchase/sell the MBS? Banks want par or close, but mark to market is putting the price at closer to 20 cents….somewhere in there is right. If the Treasury buys too high, the losses will be terrible for us! If they pay too low, the banks and financial markets will be wiped out. For the capitalist, the only way to determine what is the right price is to let the market sort it out – and we KNOW the price is south of par, way south.

    I have found a better number on the residential real estate market size – $22.5 trillion. A 30% reduce in prices is 6.75 TRILLION dollar loss. Even if MBS were priced at 85 cents, a 15% haircut, we get a 3.375 trillion dollar loss. (these are not accurate as not all residential real estate has a loan against it – but it does give the potential loss some range). Also, understand, commercial real estate is as built up, leveraged and in trouble as the residential, it is only lagging a year. Written by Tracey Coyle

Comments are closed.

Copyright Publius Forum 2001