Congressman’s ‘Explanation’ of Support for Cut and Run Strategy- Same Old Liberal Stuff

-By Warner Todd Huston

Representative Hank Johnson of Georgia’s 4th Congressional District has decided to “explain” whey he supports the cut and run act proposed by the House last week on a New Blog he has set up.

Johnson’s blog is being hosted by the “Moderate Blog Network” and some may feel that the first term Georgia Representative fits that title well. Johnson, for those who may not know, is the candidate that beat the unstable Cynthia McKinney in the last election in the 4h District and next to her ANYONE would seem “moderate”. Johnson is nothing, though, if not a typical, far left Liberal so a political moderate he is not..

His first (and so far only) entry in this Blog is an explanation of why he voted to support the “Iraq Accountability Act”.

I am passionately opposed to the war in Iraq. I am committed to bringing our brave troops home and sickened by the prospect of prolonging this tragic and unnecessary conflict.

While Johnson claims to stand on compassion here, his support of an immediate withdraw will do nothing to further the concept of saving lives.

Still, his is typical of a self-centered support of defeat. It’s all about HIS feelings couched in a somewhat dubious claim of caring for “our brave men and women in uniform”, sadly. While he seems to be trying to save the lives of our troops, he makes no mention in his “explanation” of why he doesn’t seem to care about the millions that will die in the Mid East should the US pull out now.

He doesn’t discuss the turmoil the region will fall into if we leave (the only legitimate comparison of Iraq to Vietnam, as it occurs), not to mention the chaos that would result in the world’s energy supply if the entire region were to lapse into a bloody region wide conflict between Arab nationalists and Iran with a side show of Israel standing against them both.

So, Johnson’s position on the war is the typical far left position. More proof of his being anything but moderate is also revealed in his entry.

I was an original supporter of the amendment offered by Congresswoman Barbara Lee, which called for a fully-funded, immediate withdrawal from Iraq. Regrettably, that amendment was rejected before it could even be considered on the floor. It is clear that more aggressive measures to curtail the president’s power would be destined for the same fate in this body.

This is a McGovernite, far left strategy… actually, running with your tail between your legs doesn’t even qualify as a “strategy”, so I’ll have to take that back. It’s hard to believe he cares about peace or saving lives because neither would be well served by the US cutting and running. He is not for any measured policy, but is for a radical one instead.

Johnson reveals that he is a member of the most fringe anti-war group by admitting that this particular cut and run policy he signed onto is not nearly radical enough for him but that he felt he had to support it or end up with no policy he could support. This tends to reveal that his particular ideas have little support in Congress which also shows us how radical he really is.

I carefully considered voting against this bill and holding out for something more aggressive and restrictive. But, having watched this debate unfold, I am convinced that such a proposal would not pass.

Lastly, he makes no mention of one of the other chief features of this act.

The PORK.

This bill is so larded with illicitly tacked on spending for things like peanut storage in his own state, and other boondoggle spending, that it boggles the mind and makes the lie to Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s claims that she is going to be fiscally responsible.

Among many other including the Georgia peanut funding are such things vital to the war effort as $24 million for funding for sugar beets, $40 million for the Tree Assistance Program,$22.8 million for geothermal research and development,$3.5 million in funding for guided tours of the Capitol, and far more. (For a partial pork list, see Dean Barnett)

All in all, Johnson reveals his far left radicalism and his unconcern for the lives of millions of people as well as his complete lack of any idea of how truly to create peace.

His being hosted on a claimed “moderate” site, might be indicative of the fallen state of the definition of the word “moderate” these days. If Johnson is a moderate, Attilla the Hun was merely a successful politician.

And now my beef — and it is a minor one, to be sure — with the site on which Representative Johnson’s blog appears. In today’s political climate, the term “Moderate” usually refers to someone who is in the middle on many positions and policies. I have been contacted by Johnson’s blog Host at www.goodwillhinton.com) and he informs me that by moderate they mean a more civil tone of discussion. I salute and support the laudable attempt to moderate the overheated tone of politics on he web. Too many sites are repulsive for their obscenities and hate.

But, I believe he misleads a bit using the word moderate when he means civil. I think too many visitors would, as did I, think they are searching out a middle of the road site and would find instead, some entries that are just as far left as anything one would find on Moveon.org or any other far left site. One current video posted there, for instance, claims we are living in a police state because of video surveillance systems run by city police departments.

Then there is Mr. Johnson’s obvious liberalism to confront. The final analysis is that, while Georgians may think they elected a moderate compared to what they had before, Johnson reveals he does not stray too far from the normal liberal line.

(Thanks Paul Young of Prying1.blogspot.com for passing this on)

**Note** This is a redrafted version to correct errors in original

____________
Warner Todd Huston’s thoughtful commentary, sometimes irreverent often historically based, is featured on many websites such as newsbusters.org, townhall.com, men’snewsdaily.com and americandaily.com among many, many others. Additionally, he has been a guest on several radio programs to discuss his opinion editorials and current events. He has also written for several history magazines and appears in the new book “Americans on Politics, Policy and Pop Culture” which can be purchased on amazon.com. He is also the owner and operator of publiusforum.com. Feel free to contact him with any comments or questions : EMAIL Warner Todd Huston


5 thoughts on “Congressman’s ‘Explanation’ of Support for Cut and Run Strategy- Same Old Liberal Stuff”

  1. Thanks for the hat tip on this one Mr. Huston. I appreciate your pointing out the peanut storage in his own state. I dug for info on what Hank Johnson got out of the deal but could not find it.

    – I do think you were a bit harsh on Good Will Hinton’s site. His blogroll has Hugh Hewitt as well as Daily KOS on it. You will find posts from various bloggers from both sides there. Some I agree with. Some I don’t. –

    Hank Johnson signed up and posted just 4 hours before I got there perhaps because the site does have Georgia connections. I don’t think the site asked him to sign up and post on the subject but they may have.

    Either way I think it was a public service of Good Will Hinton to allow us to see Hank Johnson’s views.

  2. I wasn’t “hard” on Hinton’s site at all. All I said is that Johnson is no “moderate” so it is hard to understand why he is on there?

  3. Publius: thanks for the link. Sorry for your confusion over our “moderate” group blog. We are moderate in so far as we shy away from extreme rhetoric and are willing to discuss any issue from any position. My contributors include lifelong Republicans, libertarians, hard-core leftist, and everything in between. The one thing that unites us is our willingness to have reasonable and charitable dialogue. Most of us aren’t fans of the liberal/conservative blog echo chamber.

    I did in fact invite Congressman Johnson to write on my blog. I am happy to have his perspective. While I don’t always agree with his position, I appreciate the fact that he is willing to think through the issues and listen to his constituents. Congressman Johnson is an outstanding advocate for his district, which is overwhelmingly Democrat. Note that Congressman Johnson isn’t calling for Bush’s impeachment and isn’t engaging in extremist rhetoric.

    I would be happy to let you write a rebuttal to Congressman Johnson on my site so long as you avoid partisan and ad hominem rhetoric.

    Peace,
    Will Hinton

  4. Mr.Hinton,

    Thanks for the reply and the explanation. Like I said to prying1, I am not attacking you or your site at all.

    Besides, it IS your blog! You certainly have every right to put on whomever you want. That is beyond dispute.

    I just found the term “moderate” confusing when applied to such a common leftist as Johnson.

    But, I see you don’t mean “moderate” as in middle political position but “moderate” in tone. Moderate not in content but in approach. While I find the usage a bit confusing in the currently accepted climate of modern politics, I celebrate your desire to keep things civil.

    Thanks
    WTH

  5. Will Hinton – You said, “Note that Congressman Johnson isn’t calling for Bush’s impeachment and isn’t engaging in extremist rhetoric.” –

    I watched the You Tube video on Mr. Hank Johnson’s .gov website (First link ‘Hank Johnson’, first paragraph of this posting) where he gave his explanation on the floor of Congress. His entire speech was filled with the continuous stream of leftist dialog against the war.

    Not one original thought.

    He, as per the standard operating procedure, used ‘no WMD’s, no terrorist connection with Sadamm, pretended it was all Bush, there was no coalition of nations invading Iraq, etc. etc. to make his points.

    It was sad to watch.

    To me, all of his speech was extremist rhetoric as is his position on cutting and running. It was straight from the “Hate Bush” handbook and gave no credit to our fighting forces for what has been acomplished in Iraq. (Sadamm’s ouster, elections, a new democratic country being established and an end to the U.N.’s criminal ‘Oil for Food program’.)

Comments are closed.

Copyright Publius Forum 2001